gasticker.com
HOME     GAS PRICES     INFO CENTRE     BOOK HOTEL ROOMS     HEADLINES     MESSAGE BOARDS
gas prices
British Columbia
Alberta
Saskatchewan
Manitoba
Ontario
Quebec
Newfoundland
and Labrador

Prince Edward Island
New Brunswick
Nova Scotia
Yukon
Northwest Territories
Nunavut
other resources
Canadian Personals
What's Hot at eBay.ca
CBC Headlines
Consumer Information
Industry Watch
Message Boards
Our Partners
Canada Watch Weblog
Garnet Knight
featured sites
 
 
Sponsored By:
Featured Article | Safety

Should States Require Motorcycle Helmets?

By Jack R. Nerad

There was an old joke about a former President who was said to have played too much football without a helmet. These days there has been a groundswell of support for the repeal of mandatory helmet laws in several states, and, after looking at the objective data, one must wonder how often proponents of that policy have played without their helmets.

Michigan is the latest state to look at repealing its mandatory helmet law. A state House bill sponsored by Rep. Gene DeRossett (R-Manchester), would remove the mandatory helmet requirement for all riders and passengers 21 years of age or older. The bill was immediately met with harsh criticism from safety experts, including those from the American Automobile Association.

"This bill just doesn't make sense," said Richard J. Miller, manager of Community Safety Services for AAA Michigan. "The evidence in support of helmet use is overwhelming. Head injury is the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. Riders who don't wear helmets and who experience a crash are 40 percent more likely to sustain a fatal head injury."

AAA Michigan's position is backed up by strong data from both the Federal General Accounting Office and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The GAO reviewed 46 studies of motorcycle helmets and helmet laws and reported helmeted riders have up to a 73 percent lower fatality rate than unhelmeted riders. In addition, helmeted riders have up to an 85 percent reduced incidence of severe, serious, and critical injuries than unhelmeted riders. The GAO concluded, "Because there is convincing evidence that helmets save lives and reduce society's burden of caring for injured riders, Congress may wish to consider encouraging states to enact and retain universal helmet laws."

In its Report to Congress: Benefits of Safety Belts and Motorcycle Helmets, the NHTSA confirmed the GAO's opinion. It found motorcycle helmets are 67 percent effective in preventing brain injuries, and unhelmeted motorcyclists are over three times as likely to suffer a brain injury as were those who are helmeted.

"When I had my motorcycle crash and suffered my head injury, it changed my life and it took a huge toll on my family," said Doug Wilson, a motorcycle crash victim from Maryland. "If anyone has the opportunity to reduce the number of head injuries, I would personally urge them to do whatever they can to spare another person from this ordeal."

When you look at the data compiled after Arkansas and Texas repealed their mandatory helmet use laws, you would be hard-pressed not to agree with Wilson's assessment. In 1997, Arkansas and Texas became the first states since 1983 to repeal "universal" laws requiring all motorcycle riders to wear helmets. Helmet use under the universal law was 97 percent in statewide surveys (1996 in Arkansas and 1997 in Texas). By May of 1998, observed helmet use had fallen to 52 percent in Arkansas and to 66 percent in Texas.

With the decline in helmet use came injuries to unhelmeted riders. Arkansas EMS data showed an increase in the number of motorcyclists with head injuries, while Texas Trauma Registry data showed that the proportion of cases involving head injury increased and that the cost per case of treating head injury increased substantially after the law change.

As to the bottom line, after the repeal of the mandatory helmet law in Arkansas, motorcycle operator fatalities were 21 percent higher in 1998 than in 1996, and in Texas, motorcycle operator fatalities were 31 percent higher in 1998 (after the repeal) than in 1996 (when the law required mandatory helmet use).

"Motorcycle riders are much more at risk than persons driving or riding in a passenger vehicle," said the AAA's Miller. "In fact, more than 80 percent of all motorcycle crashes result in injury or death to the motorcyclist."

Isn't in the best interest of all of us to protect those motorcycle riders with helmets?


Driving Today editor Jack R. Nerad is a former motorcycle rider who lost one of his high school friends to a motorcycle accident. Next Feature>>
Legendary Drives
New Mexico #1 New Mexico #1

The High Road to Taos

Heading through the 13,000-foot peaks of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains, this 58-mile trek is the most scenic route between Santa Fe and Taos.

More>>
Email Your Host
Jack Nerad

Get in touch with your host Jack Nerad, the head honcho of Driving Today.

Go>>



© 2000 Garnet Knight New Media Publishing. All rights reserved.
Send email to webmaster@gasticker.com with questions or comments about this site


This information is provided as a public service, but we cannot guarantee that the information
is current or accurate. Readers should verify the information before acting on it. The Web sites
linked to are created by or for organizations not known to us, and those organizations are responsible for the
information contained within their respective sites. Any specific comments or inquiries
regarding those sites should be directed to the individual organization.